Most of what I learn is self learning. Then it is either via some form of literature research or via structured training. Such organized training are university textbooks, semi-organized manuals, online courses.
The online courses are evolving in the technical form (from pure HTML into more interactive flash and videos) from the time I started using them in 1990s. However, content-wise the quality does not increase so fast with the years.
I easily differentiate online courses into the following areas:
- Good quality courses for masses. As example, I adore Powered platform, used by HP, Sony, P&G with their portfolio of e-courses in technologies and social topics.
- Focused technology courses leading towards Certification. An example – VMware course site.
- Learning from recorded webcasts mostly based on Powerpoint slide decks, recorded via Webex, Livemeeting, or Adobe products.
- Corporate learning programs with “strange” way of teaching. Often these courses are enforced by compliance, or sales programs and feels like listeners are IQ-challenged.
During my NGO trainer career along with other trainers I was focusing on challenging brains of participants in live environments, our trials to create online trainings for BEST organization was not too successful because of lacking of the platform to start from, not having resources, and mindset to make it great.
Today I found an interesting training which gives quite good framework where and how to create content for people to focus on their learning.
A new thing for me was Readability Statistics (it works for MS Word as well!)
I hope you will enjoy watching the presentation below and understanding exactly what makes us feel that these compliance/sales training are made for dumb people!
BTW, this blog text has readability score of 35
Elearning




